In digital circuit design, multi cycle paths (MCPs) are vital for managing timing across paths that require multiple cycles to meet setup and hold timing requirements. This article explores the significance of multi-cycle paths in Static Timing Analysis (STA), their architectural aspects, and the use of the SDC command set_multicycle_path to define MCPs in STA. Additionally, it covers the implications of unequal clock periods and explains why correctly applying MCP constraints is crucial for effective timing analysis and optimization.

Understanding Multi-Cycle Paths in STA

Path from ff1 to ff2 is a multicycle path

Typically, multi cycle path in STA assumes all timing paths must meet setup and hold checks within a single clock cycle. However, when a path requires multiple cycles, we can specify this with the set_multicycle_path command, which tells the STA engine to time the path over multiple cycles.

Example: Consider a path from ff1/Q to ff2/D, which requires three cycles to complete. By default, multi cycle path in STA would attempt to close timing in one cycle. However, using the command:

set_multicycle_path 3 -setup -from ff1/Q -to ff2/D

this path can be timed across three cycles, updating the setup and hold checks accordingly. The setup check shifts to three cycles, while hold is shifted to two cycles back.

Adjusting Setup and Hold Checks in multi cycle path

When you apply multicycle path only for setup, hold also moves along as default hold check is one edge prior to setup check

Figure: Setup and hold checks before and after applying multicyle for setup-only

On applying multicycle path for hold, hold check comes back to where it was intended. It does not impact setup check
Figure: Setup and hold checks after applying multi-cycle exceptions for both setup and hold

In multi-cycle paths, we may only need the hold check to be at the start of the cycle, i.e., zero cycles. To shift the hold check to zero, we use:

set_multicycle_path -hold 2 -from ff1/Q -to ff2/D

This command brings the hold check to zero cycles, which is often needed to prevent excessive timing violations. Here’s a summary:

Timing Path SettingDefault (Single Cycle)Multi-Cycle Path (Example)
Setup CheckOne cycleThree cycles
Hold CheckSame cycle as setupZero cycle with MCP applied

Handling Unequal Clock Periods in Multi Cycle Paths in STA

When the launch and capture clocks have different periods, defining Multi Cycle Paths in STA becomes complex. For example, if the launch clock is slower than the capture clock, the choice of Multi Cycle Paths in STA constraints should consider clock period differences.

Using -start: Applies Multi Cycle Paths in STA cycles based on the launch clock.

set_multicycle_path 2 -setup -from ff1/Q -to ff2/D -start

set_multicycle_path 1 -hold -from ff1/Q -to ff2/D -start

When provided with -start switch, shifts in setup and hold checks happen in multiples of launch clock period.
Figure: Setup and hold checks with -start option provided with set_multicycle_path

Using -end: Applies Multi Cycle Paths in STA cycles based on the capture clock.

set_multicycle_path 2 -setup -from ff1/Q -to ff2/D -end

set_multicycle_path 1 -hold -from ff1/Q -to ff2/D -end

When provided with -end option, shifts in setup and hold checks happen in multiples of capture clock period.
Figure: Setup and hold checks with -end option provided with set_multicycle_path

Table of Differences in Multi Cycle Paths Application

Constraint Type-start Option-end Option
Setup Check BasisLaunch clock periodCapture clock period
Hold Check AdjustmentHold resets to zero cyclesHold resets to zero cycles

Single vs. Multi Cycle Paths : Key Differences

AspectSingle Cycle PathsMulti-Cycle Paths
Timing AnalysisChecked within a single cycleSpans multiple cycles
Setup and Hold ChecksDefault setup and hold checksCustom checks per MCP requirements
Clock PeriodsAssumes equal periodsConsiders unequal clock periods
Design FlexibilityLimited flexibilityFlexible for complex timing needs

Best Practices for Verifying Multi Cycle Paths and False Paths in STA

Proper verification of multi-cycle paths and false paths can prevent design inefficiencies. Key methods include:

  1. Simulation-Based Verification: Confirming MCPs through circuit stimulation over multiple cycles.
  2. Formal Verification: Mathematically validating MCPs against timing constraints.
  3. Report Generation: Analyzing paths for potential timing issues.

Common Challenges and Best Practices

Best PracticeBenefit
Use TemplatesStreamlines Multi Cycle Paths definition
Create ChecklistsPrevents oversight
Follow GuidelinesAligns with design specifications
Collaborate with TeamsResolves ambiguities early
Implement Version ControlEnsures traceability

Importance of Applying MCPs in Timing Optimization

Incorporating Multi Cycle Paths into timing optimization can significantly improve area, power, and performance:

  1. Area Optimization: Avoids unnecessary cell sizing.
  2. Power Optimization: Reduces active power consumption by aligning MCP cycles.
  3. Enhanced Timing Closure: Minimizes timing pessimism, achieving reliable timing closure.

Conclusion

Multi cycle paths are indispensable for optimizing digital circuit performance in STA. Correctly defined Multi Cycle Paths enable accurate timing analysis and prevent over-constraining the design. The set_multicycle_path command is essential for defining these paths, especially when dealing with unequal clock periods. By adhering to best practices and employing thorough verification, designers can ensure robust and efficient digital circuits with optimal area, power, and timing performance.

Scroll to Top